Is it safe to then say that because man is confident in his self-attunement – whether it be lofty or lulled; certain in the value of his endowment; and even comfortable in his constitution – there’s no chance of him having full comprehension of his kinsman’s thoughts, feelings or actions; let alone establishing a connection with another from a different culture?

He can question but cannot answer. He can remark but cannot communicate. But then again, if he is able to understand another’s adjustability to life, based on their interpretation of existence and then adapting his discourse appropriately, is he not somewhat closer to creating a common waking consciousness?


© Heath Muchena, 2016


2 Comments on “79.1”

  1. vivachange77 says:

    In non-poetic language I think the more a person has clearly defined his/her stance the greater the possibility of comprehending what makes someone else tick. Empathy is the key.


  2. I of July says:

    I completely agree. Empathy is definitely the key!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s